<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" 	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" 	 	> <channel> 	<title> 	Comments on: Is Sam Darnold A GiantsTarget?	</title> 	<atom:link href="https://bleedbigblue.com/sam-darnold-giantstarget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> 	<link>https://bleedbigblue.com/sam-darnold-giantstarget/</link> 	<description>NY Giants Blog &#38; Podcast</description> 	<lastbuilddate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 06:49:24 +0000</lastbuilddate> 	<sy:updateperiod> 	hourly	</sy:updateperiod> 	<sy:updatefrequency> 	1	</sy:updatefrequency> 	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator> 	<item> 		<title> 		By: Dr. Lyle Weiser		</title> 		<link>https://bleedbigblue.com/sam-darnold-giantstarget/#comment-6173</link>  		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Lyle Weiser]]></dc:creator> 		<pubdate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 06:49:24 +0000</pubdate> 		<guid ispermalink="false">https://bleedbigblue.com/?p=9420#comment-6173</guid>  					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://bleedbigblue.com/sam-darnold-giantstarget/#comment-6168&quot;&gt;Marco&lt;/a&gt;.  Marco,    Good point. But need I make the Big Ben vs, Eli comparison? Who has been more durable and who is the &quot;thicker&quot; QB?     Darnold is definitely in the mix and would likely flourish under Eli&#039;s tutelage. However, do any of the top tier QB&#039;s in the draft rate a #2 pick this year? I&#039;m not so sure. We&#039;ll find out more during the combine and at QB&#039;s &quot;Pro Days&quot;. But I would bet that teams are going to make offers to both the Browns and the Giants to move up on draft day. Hopefully, Getty gets a good deal (maybe two) to trade down, and pulls the trigger while Nelson still remains available (at #11 - although it&#039;s difficult seeing the Bucs pass Nelson up).]]></description> 			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://bleedbigblue.com/sam-darnold-giantstarget/#comment-6168">Marco</a>.</p> <p>Marco,</p> <p>Good point. But need I make the Big Ben vs, Eli comparison? Who has been more durable and who is the &#8220;thicker&#8221; QB? </p> <p>Darnold is definitely in the mix and would likely flourish under Eli&#8217;s tutelage. However, do any of the top tier QB&#8217;s in the draft rate a #2 pick this year? I&#8217;m not so sure. We&#8217;ll find out more during the combine and at QB&#8217;s &#8220;Pro Days&#8221;. But I would bet that teams are going to make offers to both the Browns and the Giants to move up on draft day. Hopefully, Getty gets a good deal (maybe two) to trade down, and pulls the trigger while Nelson still remains available (at #11 &#8211; although it&#8217;s difficult seeing the Bucs pass Nelson up).</p> ]]></content:encoded> 		 			</item> 		<item> 		<title> 		By: Marco		</title> 		<link>https://bleedbigblue.com/sam-darnold-giantstarget/#comment-6168</link>  		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator> 		<pubdate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:56:24 +0000</pubdate> 		<guid ispermalink="false">https://bleedbigblue.com/?p=9420#comment-6168</guid>  					<description><![CDATA[TY for the comment.   I like the size of Darnold, I worry about the durability of Rosen &amp; Mayfield. Regardless trading down is definitely on the table.]]></description> 			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TY for the comment.<br /> I like the size of Darnold, I worry about the durability of Rosen &#038; Mayfield. Regardless trading down is definitely on the table.</p> ]]></content:encoded> 		 			</item> 		<item> 		<title> 		By: Dr. Lyle Weiser		</title> 		<link>https://bleedbigblue.com/sam-darnold-giantstarget/#comment-6167</link>  		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Lyle Weiser]]></dc:creator> 		<pubdate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:22:59 +0000</pubdate> 		<guid ispermalink="false">https://bleedbigblue.com/?p=9420#comment-6167</guid>  					<description><![CDATA[Marco,    Baker Mayfield said pretty much the same thing as Darnold. No question about both their respective passions for football. But we may be able to draft a QB in 2019 who will have less of a wait to start, than if the Giants pull the lever on a QB this year. With that said, the best way for the Giants to go is to hope that a team from 5-7 jumps on a possible trade down to #2. The minimum package should consist of 1st Rd. pick + 2nd Rd pick in 2018 and 1st &#038; 3rd in 2019. If the Giants can acquire that or better, they should do it with the target being OG Quenton Nelson. He&#039;s as safe a pick as there is and will man the OLG spot for at least a decade. Moreover, it gives the Giants a mauler who will be one of those &quot;Hog Mollies&quot; that Getty craves, and we will finally have a player on the O-Line that is a force (which we desperately need!).    In addition, maybe the Giants can move up a few more spots (within the top 9); acquire some more top draft choices for 2018 &#038; 2019 and still bag Nelson.]]></description> 			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marco,</p> <p>Baker Mayfield said pretty much the same thing as Darnold. No question about both their respective passions for football. But we may be able to draft a QB in 2019 who will have less of a wait to start, than if the Giants pull the lever on a QB this year. With that said, the best way for the Giants to go is to hope that a team from 5-7 jumps on a possible trade down to #2. The minimum package should consist of 1st Rd. pick + 2nd Rd pick in 2018 and 1st &amp; 3rd in 2019. If the Giants can acquire that or better, they should do it with the target being OG Quenton Nelson. He&#8217;s as safe a pick as there is and will man the OLG spot for at least a decade. Moreover, it gives the Giants a mauler who will be one of those &#8220;Hog Mollies&#8221; that Getty craves, and we will finally have a player on the O-Line that is a force (which we desperately need!).</p> <p>In addition, maybe the Giants can move up a few more spots (within the top 9); acquire some more top draft choices for 2018 &amp; 2019 and still bag Nelson.</p> ]]></content:encoded> 		 			</item> 	</channel> </rss>